Politicians of sovereign Poland held a press conference in the Sejm, during which they commented on the government's actions regarding the changes in the judicial system. Minister on Friday Adam Bodnar decided that Dariusz Barski is not a national prosecutor.
– Donald Tusk, Adam Bodnar and this entire team abolished the rule of law. They hope that in all this legal confusion, the Poles will not be interested in the details and will get away with it. I would like to ask all citizens who care to get involved. If this continues, the freedoms that Bodnar and Tusk will take away will affect all citizens, warned MEP Patrick Jacqui.
– They are trying to convey that since we violated the rule of law, they can violate the rule of law. Just like in the 18th century, when Poland was liquidated, everyone said it was necessary because the rule of law and the rights of minorities were being violated. But just because everyone in Europe said it didn't mean it was true. It was exactly the opposite, the politician claimed.
JACK: We followed the hierarchy of legal acts
Jaki recalled that one of the main charges was to make changes to the National Court Register. – The existing system that ruled decided who could become a judge. narrow clique. We have changed. For the first time, the contests were public, broadcast and justified the decision on the promotion of the judge. That's why they started to call the pro-statehood judges “neo-judges”. What we did, we did according to what is written in the constitution. If we changed something, it was by law. Always according to the hierarchy, said the PiS MEP.
– As soon as they came to power, they started to form a new doctrine for themselves. Marek Safjan said that “we must free ourselves from the trap of legal formalism”. This means you must stop obeying the law. (…) their changes in TVP – had resolution and political will. As for the national prosecutor – the law is behind us. It can be revoked, but only with the approval of the President. And they decided that if there was no such consent, they would cancel the PK based on the press release and legal considerations, – noted the sovereign Polish politician.
Patrick Jacques argued that “behind us is an act reviewed by the Supreme Administrative Court that does not include 'neo-judges.'” He assessed the entire act, including Article 47, which they refer to. has” (…) We have behind us the act, the decision of the Supreme Administrative Court, and they have legal opinions, including the wife of one of the deputies of the coalition.
“That's why they want to take PK”
– Why does it matter if we follow the hierarchy of sources of law? Since I can go and get a TVN camera, I'll just take it home. And if you tell me to return it, you will refer to the criminal law code and I will present you our resolution. And what is higher? If there is political will, we can steal from anyone. No one has destroyed the rule of law the way Tusk and Bodnar are doing, said the former deputy head of the Ministry of Justice.
Jaki noted that it should be considered why the government wants to “take over the National Prosecutor's Office”. – Only those people who pretend not to see what is happening, do not connect it with the information of the last days. that the prosecutor's office will file a case regarding that What happened to Mariusz Kaminski and Mackie Vesik? – continued the MEP.
– Revenge is the most important thing. We do not agree with this. We will fight to restore the rule of law, said the politician.
Also read:
“GW” attacks Kaminsky's wife. Tarchinsky remembered the loud wordsAlso read:
Plazinski hits Bodnar. He pointed to a specific provision of the law
(translate tags) Sovereign Poland