– It was supposed to be a mega airport, a giant transport hub, the largest transport hub in Central and Eastern Europe. It should have been there, but will it be? Has the ruling coalition already made a decision on this matter?– the host of the “i9:30” program announces this.
The material dedicated to CPK, one of the flagship investments initiated by the PiS government, was prepared by Igor Nazaruk – previously employed at “Gazeta Wyborcza” and the portal oko.press, where he covered, among others: the issue of the migration crisis at the border of Belarus (“How legally Should we help people who have crossed the border illegally? 15 questions. Prof. Łętowska's comment” – this is the title of one of the texts of this journalist).
– This is the heart of CPK. In the future – Nazaruk begins and the audience sees an empty field. Then the reporter talks to the residents of Skrževo, where the investment will be built. – Until now, their families do not know when and where they should move – he claims.
The interlocutors of the journalist are against the construction of CPK. They point out that the problem is not only expropriation, but the issue of agriculture. There are accusations of “ruining the country”. Apart from the statement of the President's advisor, Lukasz Rzepecki, there is no other positive statement regarding the port in the material. The opportunities and profits associated with making this investment were not considered.
A wave of criticism
Such biased material of Igor Nazaruk, which appeared on TVP, quickly caused a wave of criticism. “Yesterday's material about #CPK in the 19:30 program was worse than a scandal. Woe to us if it is declared “reliable, professional and honest information” and “world and day photography” – warns Maciej Wilk. , aviation expert.Wilk Analyzes material minute by minute and points out errors or omissions.
Twitter
“What runs Poland and starts with 'ż'? Rye. 'Air hub' doesn't start with 'ż', so it stands out,” says Andrzej Banucha, an analyst. “Since you asked me what I think about the CPK, I will say it again: I believe that the CPK is necessary, it should be built in its current location, there are no serious and rational reasons why it should not be built, and most of the arguments “against” are somewhere in the opponents of nuclear power and among “gas port opponents”. – says military expert Yaroslav Volsky.
Also read:
Changes in CPK. Tusk appointed his representative
(translate tags)cpk