Both of these cases shocked Polish public opinion. The first was almost 10 years ago. Journalists have shown that a certain “frog” is gaining popularity on YouTube. And it wins by showing how a luxury BMW accelerates to giant speeds through city streets. On the public road, he walks with others as if he is participating in a computer game.
The police's reasoning was simple. Robert N. published his travelogues in 2014, so he collected evidence on his own. They were secured and the case went to court. The prosecution did not want to end up with a fine, so they risked the risk of causing a disaster in land traffic, which is punishable by imprisonment.
However, the Warsaw-Mokotow District Court immediately acquitted Robert N. In the case of crazy driving in Warsaw. That's when the judge uttered strange words, following the opinion of experts, who found that the “frog” did not threaten to cause a disaster in the land traffic, “because of reckless driving, high speed and disorganization on the road, the accused was in control of his car at a critical moment.” This was – and not the first time – Polish forensic experts spat in the face of public opinion on accident reconstruction.
(translate tags)frog