I have never heard such an idiotic argument in my life
I don't know who is more stupid? The author of the text in “selective”, or people who believe… probably yes. Because following the provisions of the constitution is a trap. There is usually no better way to explain to the lemmings why the PO cares about the Constitution after so many years of bullshitting (ie doesn't care about its provisions). But on the other side, many titular “democrats” like this pattern.
However, we must admit that he is an exceptionally handsome specimen.
The legacy of the National Security Corps is pure.
A constitution is a constitution, but it is caste that decides
And here's another one.
At the end of the day, instead of leaving the stage with dignity, he prefers to fall on stage in a swamp and act as a clown…
Is this a good moral advocate?
So, when the next government changes, you will be able to be shot without trial because you will have to behave unconventionally?
Usually there are some great creatures on the other side, but the 20-25 year old reader nods in approval.
Thoughts of the day at GW
You forest grandparents are crazy and scary at the same time. The constitution and democracy must be protected, but only when the opponent is in power. What calism, what disgusting relativism.
Typical liberal “Democrats”…
Select rating Give Wojciech Sadurski Moron of the Year January 1st 1/5Give Wojciech Sadurski Moron of the Year January 1st 2/5Give Wojciech Sadurski Moron of the Year January 1st WojcieG January 1st 4/5 Give Wojciech Sadurski January 1st, he's Moron of the Year 5/ 5